Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

Know Thy Case

I had a good trial result this last week. My client was charged with Category B drug possession, which requires 42-100 grams of illegal narcotics. I had a variety of defenses planned, from arguing that my client never possessed the drugs to Fourth Amendment violations by law enforcement, but the main issue was that the State only had evidence of 37 grams. I noticed this fact early in the case, but the State seemed to have missed it until late in the process. After the State closed its case, I asked the judge to advise the jury to acquit my client because the evidence of the weight didn’t support the charge. The judge decided he was going to give that instruction. For the first time, the State asked to include a "lesser included" charge in the jury instructions (28-42 grams instead of 42-100 grams). Had they done this earlier in the process, the request would have definitely been granted. But, they waited until the close of their case. So I opposed their “less included” charge...

Latest Posts

Do It Now

Answering the phone

Welcome to Vanguard Litigation LLC's blog